Monday, November 12, 2012



The Bus to the Future, a project of Columbus, OH as part of Finding Time: Columbus Public Art 2012


-->

Since I do not have a car, I use the COTA (Central Ohio Transit Authority) bus system regularly. The bus lines, schedule, and accessibility often determine my appointments and activities. I first noticed The Bus to the Future public art installation while waiting for a bus on High Street at a bus stop labeled below with the sign, “equal opportunity.” It seemed ironic and made me think of inequality when you are car-less which impacts your ability to access job opportunities, social activities, and access in general when you live in a city that is dominated by cars and with limited public transportation.

 

The new bus stop labels are a part of The Bus to the Future public art project, conceived by the German collaborators, Martin Keil and Henrik Mayer, who call themselves Reinigungsgesellschaft, which means "The Cleaning Society” in German. They were commissioned by the city of Columbus as part of Finding Time: Columbus Public Art 2012 in conjunction with 200Columbus the Bicentennial. The duo profess that their work is an "artistic venture at the point of intersection between art and society." Other bus stops are labeled on High Street, a main street of downtown Columbus and Broad Street that intersect High.  Other phrases include: “cleaner air,” “remaking the city,” “demographic change,” “renewable energy,” “reduce dependency on oil,” “reduce emissions,” “cleaner water,” “power of diaspora,” “job creation,” “public space,” “car free care free,” “community needs,” and “to the unknown.” Large posters at bus shelters declared, “Explore Transportation Diversity,” “Social Inclusion,” “Liveable Communities,” “Local Potential, ”Redefine Freedom,” “Health Point,” “Bicycling Benefits,” and “Reduce Speculation.”

 

What I noticed next was that the signs were in English and that the focus was the use of language rather than images. This does not acknowledge the diversity of the constituency that uses the bus that includes international students and immigrants.

 

As part of their research, Keil and Mayer rode the COTA bus from one suburb to another for three days and spent two weeks to conduct interviews along the bus lines. This culminated in a workshop where they asked, “What would you call your bus line to take you into the future?” The goal of the workshop was “to spur community thought and discussion on creating sustainable options in and around Columbus/Ohio and other cities in the world.” As a result of the interviews and community workshop, labels were collected and then displayed on bus stop signs and shelters.

 




 


4 comments:

  1. This is an interesting public art project. I'm always so impressed with your critical eye. You are so right that the emphasis on language over image seems to be out of step with many groups who ride the bus. This project makes me think more about what is the difference between community engagement and collaboration? It seems that the artists did a good job of engaging the community initially, getting their input. Maybe this project is not about collaboration?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Actually, in my larger critique of this project, I also pick apart its lack of community engagement. As the workshop did not involve regular bus riders from what I could see in the documentation credits. The project stopped short of its potential. Most of the project was preconceived, so I also did not think it was collaborative.

      Delete
  2. hi chanika, this is a great report on a project happening around you. thanks for sharing it with us. i'm with constance -- i really appreciate your insightful critique of the many layers of a project's involved parties and audiences (in this case, your point about the English-language-only artwork).

    and constance, i think this is a great question about engagement versus collaboration. this project sort of seems to have 2 parts: first, engage the community for dialogue and ideas. second, the artists create a piece generated from that dialogue. maybe you're right: #1 was engagement; #2 was not community collaboration, only collaboration between the artists.

    my school project beginning next month may have some similarity in its structure. step 1: guide students in engaging with the community to gather stories. step 2: i create a play script based on those stories (this writing process can't really be collaborative because of the short time frame we have for this project---unless you 2 have some ideas for me.....!). step 3: create and perform the production of the script. i expect step 1 to be 'engagement' AND 'collaboration,' and step 3 to be 'collaboration' with the potential for continued 'engagement.' i wonder if this makes sense...

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Ryan, I posted this bus project as an example of a project that did not go as far as it could have. It is more about public art and less about community engagement. Definitely it is too preconceived to be considered collaborative with a community.

      Thank you for sharing your school project process. It sounds rich with engagement and collaborative.

      Best wishes for it!

      Delete