Hi Rubics,
I am re-writing and reframing my project question for the Collaborative Learning Experiment:
How can I facilitate an educational theater project with the intention of generating experiences, events, and artifacts that may help change school district policy?How can I prepare for, implement, evaluate, and document an interview-based educational theater project so that experiences, events, and artifacts from the project may inspire the school district to consider new policy that can grow the inclusion of the arts in its academic classrooms and increase the arts-based instructional capacity of its teachers?
The changes are small but significant: I am shifting my focus away from a goal (to change policy)--which is an expectation for someone else--and toward an intention (to strive to create the conditions for potential change)--which is a resolution for myself.
As you know, I’ve been feeling frustrated in recent weeks with delayed communications from the administrator at the school district where my residency begins in one week. In my last packet response, Bonnie, my advisor, challenged me with this question:
How might you reframe the project to be something that operates simply on shared terms and within the acknowledged reality of too little time? Are your expectations realistic given what you’ll have to work with? In short term projects, I think parachuting can be best avoided when you enter with humility and in a spirit of learning (as you are describing) and without an assumption that you’ll have some large impact. Perhaps that implies an improvisatory method, more so than something preplanned.
She also quoted one of my own statements from my packet cover letter: I said that in my frustrated correspondence with the district, I was
recognizing my tendency to want action on my own terms.
I was struck by reading my own words, repeated back to me in her response. Someone who ‘wants action on his own terms’ doesn’t sound like a person I’d be particularly interested in collaborating with. That statement is even more surprising given some of the other work I’ve been doing this semester--analyzing and critiquing different models of collaboration in professional theatre production. I’ve been criticizing the lack of collaboration in a production I was recently involved in, and I’ve been working to articulate my own values for co-creating. But confronted with my own language about this educational project, I realized suddenly that I might be losing sight of some of my own values because I’ve become focused on achieving my ambitious goal of making change. Bonnie called my attention to this troublesome development.
I considered some of the words she used to describe my approach to this project (some of which I was using, too), like “expectations” and “impact”--in a word, “goals.” Phillip Moffitt writes (in an article Bonnie gave to us at residency): “With goals, the future is always the focus: Are you going to reach your goal? Will you be happy when you do? What’s next?” (Moffitt 2003) The original question I articulated for the CRSD project is not only outcome- and future-oriented, it’s also contingent on the engagement of other people whom I don’t know very well and with whom I don’t have a long history.
I’m reframing this question to focus on “setting intentions...not oriented to a future outcome”: “You set your intentions based on understanding what matters most to you and make a commitment to align your worldly actions with your inner values” (Moffitt 2003).
The Beginner’s Guide to Community-Based Arts (Knight & Schwarzman 2005) has been helpful as I’m preparing for the residency, too. In its chapter titled “Contact,” about initiating project plans with a community, it suggests some strong reflective questions:
What assumptions might you have about a community and its people?
What common goals do you and the community share?And one suggestion:
Be as honest and as open with yourself as you are asking others to be.
I hope that the teachers I’m teaming with at Kenny Lake School will give me a chance to share my ideas and will listen openly and with optimism. I need to give them the same opportunity if this is to be a true collaborative process.
Coincidentally--or not?--as I first started the reframing of my question, I heard back from Tammy at the school district office. Communication is now off and running with Kenny Lake School teachers and staff. I’m one week from my first day at the school, and I feel that we’re in a good place in terms of the timing of our planning. This weekend, I sent them a proposed content focus for the residency; now, I’ll wait to hear their ideas for other possible directions we might go. We’ve also scheduled a planning meeting when I first arrive in Kenny Lake. I’m eager to go to the school and, as best I can, to keep my focus on the discoveries, detours, and surprises that will inevitably come our way.